Skip to content

Slaughter — Care Is a Relationship (2023)

Slaughter, Anne-Marie. "Care Is a Relationship." Dædalus, Journal of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences, 152(1):70, 2023. DOI: 10.1162/DAED_a_01962. Published under CC BY-NC 4.0.

Key findings used in wiki

The central thesis

Slaughter argues that care should be understood as a relationship, not an activity — a relationship of nurture and development that imbues a set of actions (feeding, dressing, bathing, driving, comforting, guiding) with positive impact on the person being cared for. Valuing care as part of a new moral political economy requires learning how to value relationships apart from goods and services.

Why the service/relationship distinction matters

  • The economic frame treats care as a bundle of services with relatively low wage rates — home health aides and childcare workers often make $9–$17/hour in the U.S., comparable to dog walkers.
  • That pricing underlines the presumed mechanical nature of care, as though feeding, bathing, or comforting were interchangeable services any replaceable worker could provide.
  • But care that is emotionally engaged is not interchangeable. The emotion of care, the attachment, and the relationship are what make the actions distinctively human — and are exactly what economic accounting misses.

Mutuality and solidarity as natural

  • Care is grounded more in identity than in reciprocity — an expansion of the self to embrace the interests of others as one's own.
  • Mutuality and solidarity are, in this framing, just as natural an expression of the human condition as reciprocity, proceeding from identity rather than individuation.
  • This reframing challenges the Western liberal assumption that all social relations reduce to reciprocal exchange. Many caregiver-child and spouse-spouse relationships do not, and treating them as though they did misses what is actually happening.

Gopnik's observation Slaughter builds on

Citing Alison Gopnik, Slaughter notes that the activity of caring for another triggers the biochemistry of love, tenderness, and bonding — care motivates the feelings as much as the feelings motivate the care. Even acknowledging that the causal evidence is still early, the observation matters: care is a relationship in which action and feeling reinforce each other.

Why it matters for the wiki

  • Provides a citable philosophical anchor for why GiveCare treats caregivers as people in relationship rather than users consuming a service. That framing drives Mira's voice, the trauma-informed constraints, and the anti-companion positioning.
  • Supports the value-proposition claim that caregiver support is relational work — which is why a service metric alone (tickets closed, referrals made) cannot measure whether GiveCare is actually supporting someone. A relational frame requires relational measurement.
  • Grounds the broader product position that caregiver-facing infrastructure is structurally undervalued — the $648B U.S. care economy cited on evidence/market-gap.md is economically measured almost entirely as services, which systematically understates what caregiving actually is.